At this moment in time, the three films with the highest box office sales from last weekend are Beauty and the Beast, Power Rangers, and Kong: Skull Island respectively. While all of them cover a wide variety of different themes and plots, they are all bound together by one commonality: a lack of subtlety. This is not meant as a critique (there's really nothing subtle about a giant gorilla destroying everything in its path), but it goes to show that films filled with tacit motivations and expressions are not what an audience looks for in a blockbuster. The phrase "less is more" truly defines what separates a good movie from an amazing one. I believe that mainstream American film-making couldbenefit from a little more nuance, taking inspiration from little indie gems such as Ida.
Winner of the 2013 Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film, Ida is a story based around Anna (Agata Trzebuchowska), a novice nun. In the beginning, Anna, a resident of the convent nearly her entire life, receives a request to see her last living relative before she takes her final vows. She agrees to this visit, despite her obvious discomfort with leaving the convent.
Anna immediately develops a distaste for her aunt, Wanda (Agata Kulesza). A heavy drinking and sexually promiscuous Communist party judge, Wanda serves as Anna's polar opposite on nearly every level. Watching the conflict of personalities between the two It soon becomes obvious that Wanda's intention of the meeting is to prevent Anna from becoming a nun. Her main strategy to accomplish this is by revealing some startling information to Anna: her real name is Ida Lebenstein, she's Jewish, and her parents were killed in the Holocaust. This is typically life-changing and even upsetting news, but for Ida, even if that is the case, she sure doesn't show it. All kinds of news, good or bad, are met with the same apathetic expression, all while reservedly staring at her feet. This character trait becomes the perfect illustration of who Anna is as a person.
Seeing Anna traverse her way through the secular world is truly fascinating. Most nuns we see in movies spent at least a portion of their lives outside the walls of the convent. Anna, on the other hand, is embarking on a new journey every hour she is away. Every conversation she has and every place she goes is a brand new experience from her. Many of the things we take for granted in society are challenging for her to grasp, especially when out of the context of religion. Like "The Allegory of the Cave", Anna's reality has been shattered and now she must work to find out who she really is.
Back to the topic of subtlety, what makes Ida such a mesmerizing experience is that the characters go through some extremely powerful emotions, and yet these feelings are only hinted at through the context in which they happen. For example, while in the city, Anna meets a charismatic saxophonist named Lis (Dawid Ogrodnik). Even when interacting with him, Anna manages to keep her blank expression on at all times. Yet, it becomes undeniable that she likes him, using only their simple conversations as clues. Anna could have very easily just told Wanda that she found Lis attractive. However, there is less emotional power in doing so. Humans do not share every thought and feeling they possess, so why should movie characters?As far as Ida's cinematography is concerned, it is nothing short of haunting. Make no bones about it, this is a depressing and oftentimes disturbing film. Not like a horror movie per sey, but it sure does have its fair share of shocking moments. I'm usually quite hesitant when I see that a film is made in black and white. Done correctly, it can add a new layer of emotion to the story that greatly enhances the viewing experience. Done poorly, black and white can seemingly drag the plot along, while exuding a pretentious vibe in the process. Ida is definitely in the former, with the lack of color adding to a sense of bleakness that the characters often experience. The film also makes use of long cuts, lessening the amount of shots used in a scene. In fact, some of the most exciting and suspenseful scenes of the film consist of only one shot. This leads to some unexpected results, since most action-packed scenes in film employ the use of many short cuts. The most amazing aspect of this film, is that heart-wrenching moments barely rise above a whisper. There is no loud crescendo of classical scores mixed with pained cries of defiance. In the universe of Ida, horrible things occur and the world continues as though nothing happened at all. In my opinion, that's more disturbing than anything Saw can throw at me.
The work that went into this film is quite interesting. After interviewing over 400 actresses, director Pawel Pawlikowski chose young Agata Trzebuchowska for the part after a friend saw her reading in a cafe. She apparently possessed no acting experience, and never even aspired to be in movies. Her lack of experience does not show at all on Ida, as she manages to perfectly perform a very complex character. Playing Anna is all about sending hints through visual cues, as her lines are not too revealing. This is a challenge for any actor, and yet Trzebuchowska does it with such grace. It's difficult to imagine any actor could have played Anna better than she did. This film manages to emanate such beauty with only a two million dollar budget; the best part is that it does not even feel like a movie on a small budget. Sometimes, special effects cannot compensate for expert directing.
Ida reads like an Ginsberg poem, chock-full of subliminal themes planted in a sea of artistry. Films like Power Rangers read more like a picture book, with everything laid about before you in pretty colors. Don't get me wrong, there are some stellar picture books, and I am not saying the movies you enjoy have anything to do with your intelligence. However, if you find yourself looking for a film with that subtle beauty that can be found in poetry, look no further than Ida. It is- in a word- seismic.
Watch the trailer for Ida here:

